Registered users can log in to post comments or submit items for the galleries.

There are 5 comments for this item.

Posted by Duff at 10:29 am (PDT) on Wed July 5, 2017
Yes, manual scoring was much more satisfying. With the automatic scoring, it feels like you're working for the machine, as opposed to the other way around.
Posted by GlenEllyn at 10:34 am (PDT) on Mon July 3, 2017
I miss the days of keeping score manually. These days it's a pain when the automatic scorer screws up.
Posted by Duff at 4:11 pm (PDT) on Mon April 18, 2011
Nope, I'd missed that. Good catch! (Although he could have thrown a gutter ball for his first attempt and picked up the spare; that would explain both the score and why the X is not in the left-hand box... but would a player who can bowl in the 170s throw a gutter ball??)
Posted by Gunny at 1:05 pm (PDT) on Mon April 18, 2011
If the "X" in the 6th frame of game #2 represents a strike, that bowler's total should've been 174 vice 173. Did anyone else notice?
Posted by Duff at 9:36 pm (PDT) on Sat September 5, 2009
With my poor vision, bowling was one of the few sports in which I could participate fully. I joined a league when I first moved to California, averaging around 150, but actually bowled a 264 once.

Registered users can log in to post comments or submit items for the galleries.